McSwain v. State

Petition for Rehearing.

Neal, J.

Appellant attacks the holding of this court in Hantz v. State (1929), 166 N. E. (Ind. App.) 439, and says it establishes a “new doctrine in Indiana,” not supported by reason or authority, and, in addition to the two Kentucky cases mentioned in that case, he cites Gildrie v. State (1927), 94 Fla. 134, 113 So. 704; State v. Montgomery (1923), 94 W. Va. 153, 117 S. E. 870; State v. Wills (1922), 91 W. Va. 659, 114 S. E. 261, 24 A. L. R. 1398; Hughes v. State (1907), 2 Ga. App. 29, 58 S. E. 390; and Gore v. State (1923), 24 Okla. Crim. 394, 218 Pac. 545, as cases…