Legal Opinion

Conkle v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2013No. S-12-0151PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[11] Slightly less than one year after his conviction for first-degree sexual abuse of a minor, Appellant Edwin Conkle filed a pro se motion for a reduction of his sentence. He now seeks review of the district court's denial of that motion. We will affirm.

*314ISSUE

[T2] Without identifying any legal issue, Mr. Conkle offers us only the information he presented to the district court in conjunction with his motion, and asks that we reduce his sentence. We will construe his filing as a request that we determine whether or not the district court abused its discretion in denying his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boucher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Montez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Carrillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John Leslie ChapmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Santana Mendoza v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Clarissa Dawn Hart v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Paul Harper v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Dennis Anthony Poitra, Jr. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API