Clarissa Dawn Hart v. State

DAVIS, Justice.

[11] Appellant Clarissa Hart challenges a district court order denying her motion for sentence reduction. We affirm.

ISSUE

[12] Did the district court abuse its discretion by denying Appellant's motion for sentence reduction?

FACTS

[18] The underlying facts of the offense are not particularly material to the issue before us. Suffice it to say that Appellant pled guilty to felony shoplifting. Her plea was held in abeyance and she received a deferral pursuant to Wyo. Stat,. Ann, § 7-18-301. She was placed on supervised probation for four years, If she had successfully completed this…