Legal Opinion

Boucher v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2012No. S-12-0045PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

[T1] After this Court affirmed his six sexual assault convictions in Boucher v. State, 2011 WY 2, 245 P.3d 342 (Wyo.2011), Donald J. Boucher filed two motions for sentence reduction, one through counsel and one pro se. The district court denied the pro se motion without mentioning counsel's motion. Mr. Boucher appeals, claiming the district court erred as a matter of law when it denied his motion without considering his change of cireumstances. We find no error and affirm the district court's order.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Mr. Boucher asserts the district court erred in denying his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patrick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Boucher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hodgins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Montez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. John Leslie ChapmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Santana Mendoza v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Steven Jacob Mitchell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Clarissa Dawn Hart v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Barrowes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API