Legal Opinion
Van Hollen v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0766PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Chris Van Hollen, Jr., brings this lawsuit under the Administrative Pro cedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706, challenging a regulation promulgated by defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) defining the disclosure requirements for corporations and labor unions that fund electioneering communications. Plaintiff contends that the regulation, 11 C.F.R. § 104.20(c)(9), which was promulgated in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. ("WRTL”), 551 U.S. 449, 127 S.Ct. 2652, 168 L.Ed.2d 329…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Center for Individual Freedom v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Delaware Strong Families v. Attorney General DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Center for Individual Freedom v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Brown v. FogleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.