Legal Opinion
Center for Individual Freedom v. Van Hollen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 18, 2012No. 12-5117, 12-5118PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, briefed by the parties, and argued by counsel on September 14, 2012. It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby reversed.
Appellee, Representative Christopher Van Hollen, Jr., brought a lawsuit challenging 11 C.F.R. § 104.20(c)(9), a regulation promulgated by the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”), that purports to implement § 201(f)(2)(F) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (“BCRA”), 2 U.S.C. § 434. BCRA § 201(f) reads, in relevant part, as…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Delaware Strong Families v. Attorney General DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Cook County, Illinois v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Herron for Congress v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.