Legal Opinion
Alioto v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 9, 1984No. C-81-2143 RPA, C-82-0475 RPA and C-82-0919 RPAPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AGUILAR, District Judge.
The above-captioned cases all revolve around the bankruptcy of the Pacific Far East Lines (hereinafter “PFEL”) and the company’s non-payment of payroll taxes withheld during the fourth quarter of 1977 and the first quarter of 1978. On November 10, 1983, the Court heard argument on a number of motions for summary judgment. Since the hearing, the Court has re-read the written arguments of counsel and has reviewed the documents submitted in connection with the motions. Based on these arguments and documents, and upon consideration of the relevant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home VillageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dipankar Mukherjee, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- James M. O'COnnOr v. United States of America, & Third Party v. Richard Voight, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Schwinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.