Legal Opinion
Dipankar Mukherjee, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1986No. 85-3723, 85-3761PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge.
The INS appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to appellee Dipankar Mukherjee. The INS asserts that the district court erred in holding that the INS is estopped from subjecting Muk-herjee to the two-year foreign residence requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(e). Muk-herjee cross-appeals the district court’s failure to find that the INS abused its discretion in denying Mukherjee a waiver of the two-year requirement and the district court’s failure to grant Mukherjee permanent resident status. We reverse the grant of summary judgment based on estoppel and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Montana v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Peter Lewis v. Odie Washington, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mary Nichols, Richard Gramley, Lieutenant Shaw, and Lieutenant JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Joseph F. Purcell, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.