Legal Opinion

Winnebago Tribe v. Stovall

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2003No. 02-3301PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

The State of Kansas attempted to assess fuel taxes on a corporation wholly owned by an Indian tribe. The district court in two published orders granted plaintiffs’ motions for a temporary restraining order, Winnebago Tribe of Neb. v. Stovall, 205 F.Supp.2d 1217 (D.Kan.2002), and then for a preliminary injunction, Winnebago Tribe of Neb. v. Stovall, 216 F.Supp.2d 1226 (D.Kan.2002). The district court denied the defendants’ application for a stay pending appeal of the preliminary injunction. Defendants appeal on three grounds: alleged error in the district court’s failure…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Blatchford v. Native Village of NoatakSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. RoDa Drilling Co. v. SiegalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Attorney General of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API