Eastman v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The language of the will is obscure and conflicting, but it seems plain that the trust was created in order to accomplish two distinct purposes, i.e., 1. to provide funds for the payment of the seven annuities created by clauses 7 to 13 inclusive of the will, and 2. to provide for the support of the testator’s wife and children •during the minority of the latter. It is difficult to ascertain what result the testator intended to achieve after these purposes were fully ■effectuated.
It is by no means clear that he intended that the trust should continue after all his children became of age. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Ackerman v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Tilton v. DavidsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
- Revell v. BallardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. ColbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Bellows v. PageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Epstein v. CorningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Granite State Electric Co. v. GidleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.