Legal Opinion

Bellows v. Page

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 4, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The will of the petitioner’s aunt, Mary Adams Patterson Bellows, provides merely that the petitioner’s share should be held “in trust” for her by her mother. It imposed no duties upon the trustee, it clothed her with no discretionary powers, no action on her part was required in order to effectuate any discernible purpose which the testatrix may have had in mind when she created the trust. The will, therefore, creates a use, or, in more modern phraseology, a “ dry, ” “passive ” or “naked” trust, and as such it is executed by force of the statute of uses, (27 Hen. VIII, c. 10), a statute which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heath v. HeathSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  2. Pettee v. Omega Chapter of Alpha Gamma RhoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Eastman v. First National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  4. White v. WeedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  5. Tappan's AppealSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larkin v. McCabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Bastianelli v. Toco International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Crumlish v. Delaware Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
  4. McDowell v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Murray v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API