Legal Opinion

Tim Eyman v. Robert Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 23, 2019No. 50819-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two January 23, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II TIM EYMAN, No. 50819-2-II Appellant, PUBLISHED OPINION v. ROBERT FERGUSON, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Washington, Respondent. BJORGEN, J. — Tim Eyman sought a declaratory judgment that RCW 43.135.0411 requires separate advisory votes for each tax increase set forth in Engrossed House Bill (EHB) 2163, which was signed into law by the Governor on July 7, 2017. EHB 2163, 65th Leg., 3rd Spec. Sess. (Wash. 2017). The superior court dismissed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hwayo & Michael Galassi, V. Lowes Home Centers, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  2. Hwayo & Michael Galassi, V. Lowes Home Centers, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  3. James Majors v. Multicare Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. Micah GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington, V. Alex VeveaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API