June v. Labadie
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Mary J. June against Sophie E. Labadie and Joseph A. Labadie on a promissory note. There was judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This suit is based upon a promissory note signed by defendant Sophie, and indorsed by the defendant Joseph, her husband, and is now before us for the sec*53ond time. For a more complete statement, see 132 Mich. 135. Upon the former trial the main defense was a set-off. Upon the second trial the court directed a verdict for the defendants upon the ground that the money was not borrowed for the separate estate of Sophie, but for that of her husband. Defendants gave evidence tending to show that Sophie borrowed the money from her sister to erect a house upon a lot, which lot was deeded to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Feather v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilder v. RichieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- June v. LabadieMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Shaw v. FortineMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oberg v. HonkavaaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1953