June v. Labadie
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by Mary J. June against Sophie E. Labadie and Joseph A. Labadie on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error. Plaintiff and defendant Sophie are sisters.
Read the full summary
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by Mary J. June against Sophie E. Labadie and Joseph A. Labadie on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error. Plaintiff and defendant Sophie are sisters. The suit »was commenced in justice’s court upon a promissory note, which reads as follows: “$142.04. Detroit, Mich., January 2d, 1893. “ One year after date I promise to pay to the order of Mary J. June one hundred and forty-two and 04/100 dollars, at 74 Buchanan street, Detroit, Mich., with interest at six per cent, per annum. Value received. [ Signed], “ Sophie E.…
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
(after stating the facts). 1. Plaintiff lived in New York and defendants in Detroit. The main defense is a set-off for the board of a Mrs. Kelly, their sister, and her children. Defendants claim an agreement made by letters between Sophie and the plaintiff, by which the plaintiff agreed to pay $5 a week for the board of Mrs. Kelly and her children, and that they boarded with her 84 weeks. Defendants gave plaintiff notice to produce all letters written by defendants, or either of them, to her between September 1, 1895, and May 8, 1897. In obedi*137ence to such notice certain letters were produced.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Hirshfield v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Johnson v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Goodman v. ShipleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- June v. LabadieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904