Legal Opinion

Oberg v. Honkavaara

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. Docket No. 18; Calendar No. 45,700Published

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Defendant appeals from judgment entered upon a jury verdict for plaintiff in her suit to recover the sum allegedly due her as the purchase price of a house and lot sold by her to defendant. Defendant seeks reversal and remand with directions to grant her motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Plaintiff executed and delivered to defendant a deed which named as grantees the defendant and her then husband (since deceased) as tenants by the entireties. Defendant contends that she is not personally liable, .as a matter of law, on her alleged promise to pay because it had no reference to nor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Speier v. OpferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Bolthouse v. De SpelderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Doane v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Greening v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re Estate of LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API