Legal Opinion

Town of Atlantic Beach v. Oosterhoudt

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 17, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

The Town of Atlantic Beach, by ordinance, created a protected zone between the upland and low water mark along the beach and prohibited its use with wagon, omnibus, automobile, or other motor-propelled vehicle, from three to seven P. M. on each week day, but the ordinance imposed no restriction's, whatever for its use on Sundays.

The appellee, Otto J. Oosterhoudt, filed his bill of complaint against the Town, the Town Marshal, the Town Council, and the Mayor, praying that they be restrained from enforcing said ordinance on the theory that the beach was a public highway and that the town was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. . RosenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. State v. MayoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  4. State v. Black River Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. State Ex Rel. Pennington v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ralph v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. White v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. LLOYD ENTER., INC. v. Dept. of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Ralph v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Crossan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API