Legal Opinion
Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1992No. 90-5040 through 90-5049, 90-5051, 90-5053, 90-5055—90-5059, 90-5062 and 90-5067PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Upon our order reviving plaintiffs’ claims under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5,17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5, based on § 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 476 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, and rejecting certain defendants’ contention the district court erred by reinstating the § 10(b) claims against them during trial, Anixter v. Home-Stake Prod. Co., 977 F.2d 1533 (1992) (Anixter II), defendants Kothe & Eagleton, Inc. (K & E); Wynema Anna…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Caldwell v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Guides, Ltd. v. Yarmouth Group Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Sterlin v. Biomune SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Towerridge, Inc., Sued as United States of America for the Benefit of Towerridge, Inc., and v. T.A.O., Inc., and Mid-Continent Casualty Co., AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Frymire v. Ampex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.