Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1951No. 2951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for damages on account of the alleged breach of a “Retail Protection Agreement For Automobile Dealers” dated October 21, 1948, hereafter referred to as the protection agreement-On December 21, 1948, R. D. Spann purchased a new Hudson automobile, hereafter referred to as the car, from appellant at the agreed price of $3742.32. Spann paid $1110 in cash or trade-in value and executed a combination note and chattel mortgage-covering the car for the balance of the purchase price, the note being payable in 18 equal monthly installments of $146.24 each. For a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cameron Compress Co. v. WhitingtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Whittington v. Cameron Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Powers v. Sunylan Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Neece v. A. A. A. Realty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Universal MRI and Diagnostics Inc. v. Medical Lien Management Inc. D/B/A BridgewellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Hernandez v. Home Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
  5. Neece v. A. A. A. Realty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API