Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Aiken

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1926No. 231. [fn*]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPannill, C. J.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court. E. P. Aiken and others filed suit against the Magnolia Petroleum Company. So far as material now, the plaintiff sought an accounting for gasoline produced from gas from wells drilled on premises of plaintiffs under a lease executed by plaintiffs’ predecessors in title and for damages to the land on account of salt water from said wells being permitted to flow over the premises.

On a trial a demurrer was sustained to so much of the petition as sought a recovery for gasoline. The issue of damage to the land from salt water was submitted to a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. City of San Antonio v. TalericoTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ervay, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. ConnelleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Powers v. Sunylan Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. AkinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Daniel v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API