Legal Opinion

Waddle v. Megee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 9201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

This action was brought to recover the amount •due upon a note of $954, made by the appellees to the appellant on the 16th day of February, 1866.

The appellees answered that Megee was the principal in said note, and after its maturity, to wit, on the 18th day of March, 1867, he tendered to the appellant in legal currency *248$960, the full amount of the principal and interest of said note; that he has since kept the tender good and brings said sum into court for the appellant.

A reply in denial was filed, a trial had and a verdict returned for the appellant. A new trial was granted, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leary v. EbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Collingwood v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Comstock v. WhitworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barner v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hampton v. MorganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Wayne Sewer & Drain Co. v. Ward-Cowan Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API