Legal Opinion

Collingwood v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suti Collingwood, against the Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago Railroad Company, to recover the value of a horse, alleged to have been killed by the cars of the company, where the road was not fenced.

Trial by jury at special term, verdict and judgment for *16plaintiff, over a motion for a new trial. Appeal to general term. In general term, a new trial was granted upon the insufficiency, alone, of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

Instead of taking his new trial in the Superior Court, which he might have had more than a year ago, he appealed from the decision, in general term of that court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cronk v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hill v. GoodeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. PapaIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Barner v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. CollingwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Saint v. State ex rel. HosierIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API