Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Morgan
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 1995No. 48A02-9502-CV-69PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
K. Raymond Hampton appeals the denial of his motion for a hearing on his request for damages pursuant to Trial Rule 65.
We reverse.
The facts favorable to the judgment are that Hampton was the developer of a real estate subdivision known as Sylvan Woods. Improvements in Sylvan Woods were to be made consistent with certain restrictions. and covenants, including "a 40 foot maximum set back within which all residences must be built." Record at 34. On April 28, 1987, Stephen and Joann Morgan purchased a lot in Sylvan Woods and built a house. Fred Forst subsequently…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Laux v. Chopin Land Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Ex Rel. OgdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
- Waddle v. MegeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Clevenger v. GoltryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. KapitanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Government Payment Service, Inc. v. Ace Bail BondsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- H & G Ortho, Inc. v. Neodontics International, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pflederer v. Kesslerwood Lake Ass'n, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ace Bail Bonds v. Government Payment Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.