State v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLEY, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of second-degree rape in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.3(a). For the reasons stated below, we find no error in part and remand for correction of a clerical error in part.
*452The events giving rise to the charged offense in this case occurred twenty-seven years ago in 1985. The prosecuting witness, T.L.,1 was born on 17 July 1969. Defendant, born in 1959, is her uncle.
Defendant filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony by T.L. and T.I., Defendant’s daughter, under Rules 404 and 403 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence. During a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Neville v. Appellate DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. David Raeford TrippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
- State v. TrippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022