Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 2012No. COA12-381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of second-degree rape in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.3(a). For the reasons stated below, we find no error in part and remand for correction of a clerical error in part.

*452The events giving rise to the charged offense in this case occurred twenty-seven years ago in 1985. The prosecuting witness, T.L.,1 was born on 17 July 1969. Defendant, born in 1959, is her uncle.

Defendant filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony by T.L. and T.I., Defendant’s daughter, under Rules 404 and 403 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence. During a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Neville v. Appellate DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. David Raeford TrippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  3. State v. TrippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API