Legal Opinion

Zurich Specialties London Ltd. v. Bickerstaff, Whatley, Ryan & Burkhalter, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 26, 2009No. CV 08-07066 SJO (FFMx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Docket No. 28]

S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Zurich Specialties London Limited’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed July 23, 2009. Defendant Bickerstaff, Whatley, Ryan & Burkhalter, Inc. (“Bickerstaff’) filed an Opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. The Court found this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for August 17, 2009. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

C…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CTC TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC v. QBE INSURANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  2. Heritage Bank of Commerce v. Zurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API