Legal Opinion

Grant v. Richardson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1936No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 38,750PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

This is an action under the survival act (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §14040 et seq.) brought by plaintiff, Eunice Grant, administratrix of the estate of Clinton Grant, deceased, against Serle R. Richardson and the Contract Cartage Company, a Michigan corporation. Deceased was born in 1890 and for a number of years prior to his death had been employed by the Chevrolet Motor Company. For more than five years previous to this accident, deceased had earned on an average of $151.97 per month.

Shortly before six o’clock on the morning of April 14, 1934, defendant Richardson, an employee of the Cartage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leonard v. HeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Graham v. HagmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Lawrence v. Bartling & Dull Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Corey v. HartelMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Deantonio v. New Haven Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Grover v. SimonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Kolehmainen v. E. E. Mills Trucking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Leete v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Goldbaum v. James Mulligan Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API