Corey v. Hartel
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Cross (Orien S.), J. Case by Ossin Corey against Frederick and Carl Harte!, copartners as Hartel Brothers, for personal injuries. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
On December 17, 1919, George Rish was driving a one-horse sleigh on Washington street in the city of Grand Haven. His wife sat on the seat with him. The plaintiff, with his consent, was sitting on some hay in the back part of the sleigh with her feet hanging over on the left side. Rish was driving west. The street was 30 feet in width between the curbs. He met and passed an automobile truck belonging to the tannery. A few feet behind it, the distance being in dispute, came a one-ton Ford truck, owned by the defendants and driven by the defendant Carl Hartel. It is plaintiff’s claim that, when…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buxton v. AinsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Milbourne v. Arnold Electric Power Station Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by24 opinions
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Brown v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Hunter v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.