Robert McBurnie v. Prescott, City Of
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
1. We reverse the district court’s summary judgment for defendants on McBur-nie’s First Amendment retaliation claim. “[T]he determination whether the speech in question was spoken as a public employee or a private citizen presents a mixed question of fact and law.” Posey v. Lake Pend Oreille Sch. Dist. No. 8b, 546 F.3d 1121, 1129 (9th Cir.2008). “[T]he scope and content of a plaintiffs job responsibilities can and should be found by a trier of fact....” Id. Viewing the evidence at the time of summary judgment in the light most favorable to McBurnie as the non-moving party, he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Lambert v. AckerleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Posey v. Lake Pend Oreille School District No. 84Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Cordova v. R & A Oysters, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016
- Morales v. RoxBox Containers, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Perez v. Acme Universal, Inc.District Court, D. Guam · 2014
- Regan v. HDR Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.