Legal Opinion
Perez v. Acme Universal, Inc.
District Court, D. Guam
Decided April 8, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00008Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM 6 TERRITORY OF GUAM 7 8 THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, CIVIL CASE NO. 12-00008 9 United States Department of Labor, ORDER & OPINION RE: DEFENDANTS’ 10 Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S vs. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 ACME UNIVERSAL, INC., a corporation, 12 and XIN BO “PAUL” YU, an individual, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint 16 (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Acme Universal, Inc. and Xin Bo “Paul” Yu (collectively 17 “Defendants”). See ECF No. 66. On March 31, 2014, the parties…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Herron v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.