Legal Opinion

Haray v. Haray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 55, Calendar No. 38,748PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Rosa Haray on. February 7, 1934, was the owner of certain farm lands on which John and Elizabeth Haray held a mortgage. John was the former husband of Rosa and the premises had been awarded to her in a divorce decree. Being in need of funds, plaintiff afterwards mortgaged the premises to another, and this mortgage was sold to John Haray and his present wife, and shortly thereafter they commenced foreclosure by advertisement. Sale was had on March 10, 1933, and before the expiration of the period of redemption, a bill was filed for moratorium relief to which defendants filed an answer and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Freeman v. Wayne Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Harris v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Cox v. GressSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  5. City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sleboede v. SleboedeMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Ex Rel. Hall v. NiewoehnerMontana Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API