Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Wayne Probate Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. Calendar 31,809PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWlEST, J.

This is certiorari to review mandamus. Plaintiff, special administrator of the estate of Mary C. Kempf, deceased, requested the probate court for -the county of Wayne to authorize him, as executor named in the will of the deceased, to engage counsel and obtain evidence to assist in securing the admission of the will to probate in a contest certified to the circuit •court. This the probate court had power to do. Act No. 281, Pub. Acts 1923. He claims the probate judge granted such authority and admonished him “to employ good ones.” He employed himself and two other attorneys. The authorization…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Carr v. CorningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Quinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stark v. Heart River Irrigation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Workers' Compensation Agency Director v. MacDonald's Industrial Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Curtis v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. LindemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API