Legal Opinion

Wright v. Young

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1907No. 14,772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This case involves the construction of chapter 526 of the Laws of 1905. The single question for decision is whether the district court erred in holding that the statute does not change or enlarge the issues upon an application for the probate of a will.

On July 13, 1905, in the probate court of Atchison county, Corman H. Young offered for probate a paper *288purporting to be the last will and testament of Eva Hendershot, deceased. He .was named therein as executor and sole legatee. Upon the hearing a number of the heirs at law of Eva Hendershot…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lanning v. GaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Bethany Hospital Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Wenger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pee v. CarlyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of DurantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. McConnell v. KeirSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. McFadden v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API