Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McKenzie v. Forrest

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1895No. 1684PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate against the respondent as commissioner of public lands, to compel him to issue a deed to the relators of lots 57 and 58 in front of the city of Fairhaven, under the act relating to the sale of tide lands. The case is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, whereby it appears that the relators have proven every essential fact by them to be proved, and have performed every condition precedent, including a tender of the purchase price of said lots, to entitle them to purchase under their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People ex rel. Teschemacher v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Scurry v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Chlopeck Fish Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. City of Tacoma v. TitlowWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pearl Oyster Co. v. HeustonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Smith Tug & Barge Co. v. Columbia-Pacific Towing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API