Legal Opinion

Pearl Oyster Co. v. Heuston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1910No. 8434PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered August 9, 1909, reversing, on appeal, a decision of the board of state land commissioners in which the board granted an application to purchase oyster lands.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 24th day of October, 1907, Myron T. Heuston, J. S. Ferguson, Louise Heuston, Ida Peters, M. A. Riley, Herman Martin, and Edward F. Fay, filed in the office of the commissioner of public lands of this state their several applications to purchase certain tide lands of the second class in Skagit county, as oyster lands. Notice of the applications was published as prescribed by law, and within the time limited by law, the Lake Whatcom Logging Company, the Pearl Oyster Company, the Oyster Creek Oyster Company, and one J. J. Cryderman protested against the allowance of the applications,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Teschemacher v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Andrus v. KnottOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Walker v. The State Harbor CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Welsh v. CallvertWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. McKenzie v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pace v. State Ex Rel. RiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Davidson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cincinnati v. Thomas J. Emery MemorialOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API