Chlopeck Fish Co. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered July 6, 1910, in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action to enjoin a city in the construction of a wharf in a street extended over tide lands and across the harbor area, after a hearing before the court. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The state’s first plat of the Seattle tide lands and water front was filed in February 1895'. It extended every alternate street of the city streets, originally running to the water front, in a direct line over the tide lands and harbor area to the outer harbor line. Among these streets was Vine street, *318which was thus extended a little over 300 feet, practically at right angles to the upland. All of these extensions were 100 feet in width. ■
In 1897 the city of Seattle caused .to be prepared a correction or revision of the above mentioned plat and submitted the same to the state legislature…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Haight v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Potomac Steamboat Co. v. Upper Potomac Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sears v. Western Thrift Stores of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Marchioro v. ChaneyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Gregg Neck Yacht Club, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Knappett v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Troska v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.