United States Light & Heat Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Judge.
The plaintiff, in three separate suits, Nos. E-247, F-253, and H-460, seeks to recover excise taxes paid upon the sales of storage batteries and storage battery parts. The taxes were imposed and collected under the provisions of sections 900 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 .and 1921, e. 18, 40 Stat. 1122; c. 136, 42 Stat. 291, and section GOO of the Revenue Act of 1924, e. 234, 43 Stat. 253 (26 USCA §§ 881 note, 882).
Sections 900 of the acts of 1918 and 1921 are identical, and read as follows:
“That there shall be levied, assessed, collected, and paid upon the following articles…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
- McCaughn v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Hanna Nickel Smelting CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
- Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Englert Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- M. & M. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933