Legal Opinion

Universal Battery Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1933No. D-785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The plaintiff sues to recover the sum of $30,884.34, of which sum $27,841.35 represents excise taxes paid upon the sale of electric storage batteries manufactured by it. The remaining $3,042.99 represents additional interest alleged to be due on a refund of taxes made to plaintiff on July 19, 1923, of $26,809.82, erroneously collected on the sale of battery parts. This item of the claim is abandoned by plaintiff in the brief, and the *885only question presented is the plaintiff’s right to recover the taxes paid on the sales of completed batteries during the taxable period involved.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. McCaughn v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  4. Anthony Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Milwaukee Motor Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Universal, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Englert Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. M. & M. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API