Matte v. Caplan
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Believing that the complaint filed against him was improper, the appellant sought attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2013). In accordance with the procedure set forth in section 57.105(4), appellant served a motion to dismiss on appellee/plaintiffs counsel twenty-one days prior to filing his motion to dismiss the complaint and motion for attorney’s fees. Appellee did not dismiss the complaint until after that time. Nevertheless, at the hearing on the attorney’s fees motion, appellee objected to the section 57.105 sanction, because appellant had failed to serve the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lago v. Kame By Design, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial AdministrationSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Montgomery v. LarmoyeuxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Brower-Eger v. NoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Cano v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boatright v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Sandra Kent Wheaton v. Mardella WheatonSupreme Court of Florida · 2019
- Wheaton v. WheatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Goersch v. City of Satellite BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Isla Blue Development, LLC v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.