Legal Opinion

Cano v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 18, 2009No. 4D08-2108PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the Appellee, Hyundai Motor America, Inc., pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442.The Appellant, Daila Cano, contends that the award was improper because Hyundai’s joint settlement offer failed to satisfy section 768.79 and rule 1.442’s apportionment requirement. We agree and reverse.

Daila Cano and Guillermo Cano purchased from Hyundai a 2000 Hyundai Accent. After taking possession of the car, the Canos experienced various operating defects. Due to these defects, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb v. MatetzschkSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Graham v. Peter K. Yeskel 1996 Irrevocable TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Brower-Eger v. NoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ancel Pratt, Jr. v. Michael C. Weiss, D.O.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Valerie Audiffred v. Thomas B. ArnoldSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  3. Matte v. CaplanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Montgomery v. LarmoyeuxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Hoang Dinh Duong v. ZiadieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API