Legal Opinion

Wheaton v. Wheaton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 2017No. 16-0490PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.

Appellant Sandra Wheaton seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to a proposal for settlement. The trial court denied the motion because the proposal for settlement, which was served upon Appel-lee by e-mail, failed to comply with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516, which sets forth certain requirements for service by e-mail. Appellant contends that rule 2.516, and its e-mail requirements, are inapplicable because a proposal for settlement is not filed contemporaneously with the court. A trial court’s interpretation of court rules is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. ReidSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Matte v. CaplanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Chiquita Kiara Floyd v. Stacy L. Smith, Jason Owen SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boatright v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Sandra Kent Wheaton v. Mardella WheatonSupreme Court of Florida · 2019
  3. JOHN MCCOY v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Goersch v. City of Satellite BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Bank of New York Mellon v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API