Legal Opinion

Dixie Stockgrowers' Bank v. Washington County

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1933No. 4747PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EPHRAIM HANSON, Justice.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $373.72, which amount it claims as excessive taxes paid under protest in the year 1925. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount prayed. The defendants have attempted to appeal from such judgment. A careful study of the record discloses that this court is without jurisdiction to review the action of the trial court, for the reason that the appeal was not taken in time. The question is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. StringfellowUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Logan City v. BlotterUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Anderson v. Halthusen Mercantile Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Wayland v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bailey v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bailey v. Sound Lab, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities, Business Telephone Systems v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API