State v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
PEARCE, Judge:
11 Defendant Joshua Gene Schmidt appeals from a district court order denying his motion to review and modify his sentence. We conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.
T2 In 1998, the district court accepted Defendant's guilty plea on a third-degree felony and sentenced him to an indeterminate prison term of up to five years. The court then suspended that sentence in favor of probation supervised by Adult Probation and Parole (AP & P).
13 In 2000, the district court issued an order for Defendant to show cause upon AP & Ps…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CandedoUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. YazzieUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Bailey v. Sound Lab, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Dixie Stockgrowers' Bank v. Washington CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schvaneveldt v. South Davis Metro FireCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022