Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 23, 2015No. 20131124-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

PEARCE, Judge:

11 Defendant Joshua Gene Schmidt appeals from a district court order denying his motion to review and modify his sentence. We conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.

T2 In 1998, the district court accepted Defendant's guilty plea on a third-degree felony and sentenced him to an indeterminate prison term of up to five years. The court then suspended that sentence in favor of probation supervised by Adult Probation and Parole (AP & P).

13 In 2000, the district court issued an order for Defendant to show cause upon AP & Ps…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CandedoUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. YazzieUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bailey v. Sound Lab, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Dixie Stockgrowers' Bank v. Washington CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schvaneveldt v. South Davis Metro FireCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API