Boyle v. Boyle
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court. Action by Mary Elizabeth Boyle against John Boyle. Judgment for defendant, and both parties appeal.
1DissentEllsworth, J.
I am unable to agree either in the reasoning or the result of the foregoing opinion. I believe that the reasoning of my associates proceeds upon an erroneous view, if not an entire misapprehension, of the purpose for which temporary alimony is allowed by our statute; and that the result announced presents an instance in which a rule of practice well settled, and generally salutary in its application to a proper case, is in this case so misapplied as to be productive of great hardship, and possibly grave injustice. Under our law there is a wide and radical difference both in the purpose and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Gercke v. SeddonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In re Estate of RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Williams v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.