Legal Opinion

Edward Jordan v. Dean Foods

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2016No. Docket 43281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission (the Commission) finding that Edward Jordan failed to prove entitlement to additional’ benefits for accidents that occurred during his employment. The Commission based its decision, in part, on a finding that Jordan failed to prove that the need for his 2012 cervical spine surgery was caused by a 2010 accident that occurred while Jordan was working as a milk delivery driver for Dean Foods. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Jordan served over twenty-one years in the Navy, retiring in 2003. While in the *796Na…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Painter v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dallas Clark v. Shari's Management CorpIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Anderson v. Harper's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oliveros v. Rule Steel Tanks, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Oliveros v. Rule SteelIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Proulx v. Saveway Market, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API