Groner v. Groner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal from orders setting the amount of child support, alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and costs to be paid by appellant. Five issues are raised for our review: first, that the order regarding alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and costs is appealable; second, that the alimony pendente lite award should not have been made retroactive; third and fourth, that the court below erred in imputing an excessive amount of appellant’s corporate assets as personal earning capacity and in not considering appellee’s assets vis-a-vis the alimo*193ny pendente lite…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Rutherford v. RutherfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hatalowich v. BednarskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Parkinson v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Lozoskie v. Lozoskie, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1998
- Groner v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Madden v. MaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.