Legal Opinion

Groner v. Groner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1984No. 173 and 174PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal from orders setting the amount of child support, alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and costs to be paid by appellant. Five issues are raised for our review: first, that the order regarding alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and costs is appealable; second, that the alimony pendente lite award should not have been made retroactive; third and fourth, that the court below erred in imputing an excessive amount of appellant’s corporate assets as personal earning capacity and in not considering appellee’s assets vis-a-vis the alimo*193ny pendente lite…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Rutherford v. RutherfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Hatalowich v. BednarskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Parkinson v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lozoskie v. Lozoskie, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1998
  4. Groner v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Madden v. MaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API