Parkinson v. Lowe
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, J.:
¶ 1 Barry Lowe, David Whitney, and Dawn Whitney appeal the trial court’s January 7, 2000 order granting costs to appel-lees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
¶ 2 This action arose from an action to quiet title. In 1968, appellees began using the vacant lot adjacent to their property. See Parkinson v. Lowe, No. 1819 Pittsburgh 1998, 742 A.2d 1160, unpublished memorandum at 2 (Pa.Super. filed July 8, 1999). They used it for a multitude of activities and put up various structures and a fence. See id. at 3. In 1993, appellees discovered that appellants were attempting to buy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Raio v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- DeAngelis v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Groner v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sayler v. SkutchesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Leoni, E. v. Leoni, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Metro Real Estate v. Siaway, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Metro Real Estate v. Siaway, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Schlisman, S. v. Urban Space Develop.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.