Legal Opinion

United States v. Stefan E. Brodie

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 2005No. 02-2662PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Stefan E. Brodie was found guilty by a jury of conspiring to trade with Cuba in violation of the American Cuban embargo currently in place under the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 (“TWEA”) and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (“CACRs”). The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, ruling on a previously reserved motion for judgment of acquittal, thereafter acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was insufficient evidence of his knowing and willful participation in the charged…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Richard Caraballo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API