Legal Opinion

Abramowitz v. Voletsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In this action for an accounting and fraud, plaintiff moves to strike the answer of defendant because of his failure to respond to certain questions and because of his failure to execute the transcription of his examination before trial. Plaintiff also seeks the appointment of a Special Master to supervise the disclosure proceedings at the expense of the defendant.

The defendant refused to answer the questions on the ground of self incrimination. Examination of the complaint reveals that it contains allegations of conduct by the defendant, proof of which might constitute a crime. There is no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Levine v. BornsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Barbato v. TuostoNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. McKelvey v. Freeport Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Alvarez v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Abbate v. NolanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Merck, Sharp & Dohme v. Whitted, New York County Courts1973
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API