Legal Opinion

Barbato v. Tuosto

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.

Upon an examination before trial, held pursuant to order of the court, the defendants Ida and Grace M. Tuosto (defendant Daniel has not been served) refused to answer several material questions on the ground of self incrimination and, on the same ground, refused to produce certain personal papers and records called for by the order. Upon the argument, it was conceded by plaintiffs that the complaint contains allegations of conduct by the defendants, proof of which might constitute a crime or crimes, and no claim is made that answers to the questions propounded and the documents sought to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lerner v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Levine v. BornsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Southbridge Finishing Co. v. GoldingNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McKelvey v. Freeport Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Alvarez v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Abramowitz v. VoletskyNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Walker v. Security Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API