Former Employees of Barry Callebaut v. Herman
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This case is before the court following the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor” or the “Department”) voluntary remand of January 31, 2001. Plaintiffs, Former Employees of Barry Callebaut (“Former Employees”) filed petitions for transitional adjustment assistance (“TAA”) and NAFTA transitional adjustment assistance (“NAFTA TAA”). Following the voluntary remand, Labor denied Plaintiffs’ eligibility for both programs. Barry Cal-lebaut USA, Incorporated, Van Leer Division, Jersey City, New Jersey; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Local 167, International Molders & Allied Workers' Union ex rel. Group of Aggrieved Workers v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Former Employees of Hawkins Oil & Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Former Employees of Barry Callebaut v. Elaine Chao, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Former Employees of Rohm & Haas Co. v. ChaoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Former Employees of Chevron Products Co. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Anderson v. United States, Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Former Employees of Barry Callebaut v. HermanUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.