Legal Opinion

Lieblein v. George

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 136Published

Error to Houghton, O’Brien, J. Assumpsit by Edward M. Lieblein against Elias George for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff is a wholesaler of groceries in the city of Hancock. Defendant is engaged in the retail grocery trade at Houghton. In January, 1911, defendant was declared a bankrupt upon his own petition. Soon thereafter he went,to plaintiff, with whom he had been dealing for several years, and said to him he thought he could make a good settlement with his creditors if he could secure the money to pay them; that he needed $4,700. He proposed to plaintiff that if he would advance it, or aid him in getting it, he would pay him his claim in full, which amounted to $774.32. Plaintiff consented, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nurney v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Craig v. SeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McCormick v. SolinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
  4. Tinker v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API